Prescribing is by law
No course changes who may prescribe.
The right to prescribe. That is set by law, not by a certificate.
Botulinum toxin is a prescription-only medicine, and the law is specific: it must be prescribed by a prescriber who has assessed that individual patient face to face. Remote prescribing for patients a prescriber has never met is not lawful, and no training course confers a prescribing right on anyone. A course advertised as a route to independent injecting is selling something it cannot deliver.
The age rule is newer and absolute. Since 2021 it has been a criminal offence in England to administer botulinum toxin or cosmetic fillers to a person under 18 for cosmetic purposes, or to arrange it. Parental consent is irrelevant. Any clinic or academy willing to discuss it is telling you how it treats every other rule.
Then there is the certificate problem. This market is full of impressive-looking documents that no regulator stands behind, and delegates discover the difference when an insurer asks. Saying plainly whether a route is Ofqual-regulated, and naming the awarding organisation when it is, costs enrolments and is the only honest version.
No course changes who may prescribe.
A criminal offence otherwise, consent or not.
Regulated, or attendance. Not blurred.
Ask before booking. It costs nothing and may save you a course fee.